Being a person who spends significant time interacting with people on the internet, as well as being occasionally hard to deal with, has led to me being told to "Eat Shit and Die" more times than I should be willing to admit. However, and I couldn't tell you what started me thinking about this, would it be worse to Eat Shit and Die or to Eat Shit and Live? As I'm unsure if anyone actually reads this or not, I have no issues with going into it.
ESAD-
Why it's worse: First off, you ate shit. Secondly, you died. Being dead, regardless of what you may have seen on TV or in the movies, probably sucks an incredible amount. Add to this the fact that your last memory is of you consuming shit, your afterlife will not be starting off on the right foot.
Why it might be better: If there isn't an afterlife, you will have no recollection of what you have just done, making the fact that you did it irrelevant. People also tend to only remember the best about the dead, so your last meal probably won't ever come up in conversation. It'll be like it never happened.
ESAL-
Why its worse: You're going to remember this one forever, and worse, so will anyone else who knows about it. You could cure cancer or be the first person to land on Mars, and there would still be a significant portion of the population that would remember you as having eaten shit. It probably won't help your love life any either.
Why it might be better: At least you aren't dead...
If anyone does actually read this, comment with your opinion.
May all your hits be crits,
B
No comments:
Post a Comment